Monday, April 6, 2015

DESMA9 Week1- Two Cultures



The division between arts and sciences is something I’ve never really put much thought into. This division has become clearer at UCLA.
 https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xap1/v/t1.0-9/p206x206/10500509_579403352179256_3700692724557908396_n.jpg?oh=cd4f63ea69ab8cb2e88f826967c26f2b&oe=55A746D7&__gda__=1436508041_cba9985d88eddaa00a2c3cd94e332359
I entered as an applied math major, which placed ne solidly in south campus. This identification as a ‘science-y’ person resonated with me, as I’ve always liked math better than writing or history, but I didn’t give thought to this division between north and south as directly influencing my thoughts.  Last quarter I switched to economics, and it was a little weird being closer to the middle of the spectrum. The parts of Snow’s essay about the perceptions literary intellectuals and scientists have of each other stood out to me. I fear I had fallen into that trap a little last year, segmenting UCLA students and ‘identifying’ with a group, further solidifying the division between arts and sciences.

These differences pointed out in Snow’s essay reminded me of a story I had read in a collection of stories- Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman! Richard Feynman was an accomplished physicist, and his friend was an artist. They decided to try and teach each other some of their vocations, and so a physicist learned to sketch.
thumbnail of Dabney Zorthian
http://www.museumsyndicate.com/artist.php?artist=380
Part of why this interested me was their discussion about beauty; I linked a quote from Feynman below that illustrates it.
I think this shows how science can enhance something generally thought to belong to art- beauty. This goes into questioning beauty as something simple or deriving from understanding, as a simple flower is much easier to relate to for me than some of the more abstract sculptures in the sculpture garden, which I know absolutely nothing about.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fc/UCLA_Franklin_D._Murphy_Sculpture_Garden_picture_3.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Murphy_Sculpture_Garden
  Similarly, there are many ways in which the humanities can enhance scientific education.
Some of the division possibly derives from the perceived worth of the subjects. As stated in the Changing Education Paradigms animation, our education system is very industry focused, and its ‘purpose’ is to get employed. A running jokes is that south campus majors are guaranteed good jobs, while north campus majors aren’t. Though said commonly as a joke, this hints at a difference in perceived worth between the humanities and sciences. Some hurdles to overcome are these perceptions: stigmas and stereotypes associated with different subjects, and making positive connections- such as what each can contribute or how they can enhance each other- instead of reasons why they’re different.

Citations:
UCLA Snaps community Facebook page. Photograph. n.p. Web. 4/5/2015 <https://www.facebook.com/pages/UCLA-Snaps/517894448330147>
Richard P Feynman, Ralph Leighton, Edward Hutchings. Surely You’re Joking, Mr. Feynman!.     1985. New York : W.W. Norton.
Richard P Feynman. Dabney Zorthian. Alphonse Mucha Fine Art. 1964. Photograph. n.p. web. 4/5/2014.
<http://www.museumsyndicate.com/artist.php?artist=380>
Springer-Verlag. The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants. Algorithmic Botany at the University of Calgary. 1990. Web. 4/5/2015. <http://algorithmicbotany.org/papers/>
Jacques Lipchitz. Song of the Vowels. Wikipedia. Photograph. n.p. web. 4/5/2015. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franklin_D._Murphy_Sculpture_Garden>

No comments:

Post a Comment